Eurograd message

Message posted on 08/09/2022

Online seminar series on “Attending as practice in the attention economy” - first speaker James Williams Oct 5th

Online seminar series on Attending as practice in the attention economy

Within the ESDiT (Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies) project, the working group on Attention Economy organizes an online seminar-series on Attending as practice in the attention economy.

Aim: The online series aims to contribute, using philosophy and ethics, to constructively critique the attention economy (the tech industry's business model that treats human attention as a commodifiable resource).

Speakers currently planned: When Who Title Wednesday, October 5, 2022, 13:30 PM -15:00 PM CEST James Williams 'A Lightbulb for the Mind: Possible Futures for the Attention Economy' Wednesday, October 26, 2022 9:00 AM-10:30 AM CEST Peter Hershock Intelligent Technology, the Attention Economy, and the Risks of Consciousness Hacking: A Buddhist Perspective Wednesday, November 23, 2022 10:30 AM-12:00 PM CET Silvia Caprioglio Panizza Grounding ethics through attention: Murdoch, Weil, and Zen Buddhism Wednesday, December 14, 2022 10:30 AM-12:00 PM CET Soraj Hongladarom Toward an Ethics of Attention.

Interested in attending? Please write to Secretariat.P& which of these sessions you want to attend. You will then receive a link to join the online seminar.

We are looking forward discussing this with you. Gunter Bombaerts, Joel Anderson, Matthew Dennis, Lily Frank, Tom Hannes, Jeroen Hopster, Madelaine Ley, Lavinia Marin, Alessio Gerola and Andreas Spahn

Background The attention economy refers to the tech industry's business model that treats human attention as a commodifiable resource. The libertarian critique of this model, dominant within tech and philosophical communities, claims that the persuasive technologies of the attention economy infringe on the individual user's autonomy and therefore the proposed solutions focus on safeguarding personal freedom through expanding individual control. While this push back is important, it uncritically accepts the framing of attention as a scarce commodity, giving rise to incomplete assessments of the moral significance of attention, and obscuring richer sets of ethical strategies to cope with the challenges of the attention economy. We step away from a negative analysis in terms of external distractions and aim for positive answers, by approaching attention as practice. The series engages with speakers from all kinds of backgrounds (philosophy on authors like Iris Murdoch, Martha Nussbaum, Simone Weil, Merleau-Ponty, Harry Frankfurt, or Buddhist ethics ; psychology; artificial intelligence; ). Questions that will be central in the online series: 1-What do attention and related concepts mean in the attention economy? 2-How is attention a basis for or related to morality? 3-How can attention (and related concepts) be built in the design of the attention economy in a humane way? To answer this last question, we think the philosophical debate should turn from a negative to a positive focus:

  • From What are the distractions? to How can wisdom practices, virtues, support a desirable form of attention?;
  • From I must take back control of my attention to How can we use attention for flourishing, wisdom, ?;
  • From reacting against promising (false?) free comfort to supporting acceptance of necessary effort; and
  • From increasing individual needs in the attention economy to support collective or intentional joint attention in the attention ecology.

    EASST's Eurograd mailing list Eurograd (at) Unsubscribe or edit subscription options:

Meet us via

Report abuses of this list to

view as plain text
Follow by Email